The Circular Food Systems Initiative (CFSI) develops a framework for strengthening food systems across the lifecycle, from production through post-harvest handling, processing, distribution, end use, and organic recovery. In each application context, the framework is applied where failure, fragmentation, and value loss are most severe.
At present, post-harvest continuity tends to be one of the weaker points in the chain. The framework (CFSF) treats it as part of a broader lifecycle challenge that also includes food integrity, environmental impact, and upstream production conditions.
In fragile and emerging economies, food-system failure is not only a question of insufficient production. It is also a question of multi-dimensional lifecycle leakage: value loss between production and end use, alongside fragmented institutional responsibility across the chain.
CFSF addresses that condition. It brings a coherent framework to a domain that has too often been approached through isolated projects without a shared basis for continuity.
CFSI is being developed through a small set of active and emerging application contexts. Current work in West Africa, particularly in Senegal and Burkina Faso, provides a strong basis for early application, supported by existing relationships, local capacity, and production-side work already underway through the Sahel Bridge Initiative.
Overview materials, framework documentation, and supporting background are available upon request.
Beyond production shortfalls and post-harvest leakage, food-system failure includes weak food integrity, lifecycle environmental impact, poor recovery of organic side streams, fragmented handling and processing, and institutional arrangements that fail to keep these functions aligned.
CFSF responds at framework level by defining the logic and procedures needed to strengthen continuity where the chain is weakest.
CFSF is operational, with refinement continuing through each new application context. Current work strengthens its internal logic and broadens the basis for pilot application.
The framework is intended for use across the food-system lifecycle, but it does not assume the same pressure points in every context. It is applied where breakdowns are most severe, so that continuity, value retention, recovery, and coordination can be strengthened where the chain is weakest.
Application is there to test and strengthen the framework, not to reduce it to a single pilot or geography. Current application contexts help show where the framework holds, where it needs refinement, and how its logic matures through use.
CFSF deployments incorporate CSGF (TG-FRM-2000 – Circular System Governance Framework) for decision support and continuity.
An internal strategic simulation prototype supports framework testing – comparing intervention pathways and examining how food-system variables interact across application contexts.
Capability development within CFSF is an execution-enabling layer. It is not treated as a generic training function, but as a way to prepare public institutions, operators, implementation partners, and other relevant actors to apply the framework in real conditions.
These programmes can be activated as implementation needs become clearer, with content shaped by the application context, actor roles, and weaknesses across the food-system lifecycle.
The framework is anchored under UGA-0000422 (Food & Biological Systems Continuity) and UGA-0000304 (Clean-Loop Processes), with UGA-0000413 (Ecological Continuity) and UGA-0000440003 (Food-Water-Energy Nexus) providing cross-domain positioning. Within this architecture, food-system standards address lifecycle leakage and institutional responsibility across the chain.
The standards layer shapes how interventions are framed and how continuity is preserved as implementation passes between actors and operating cycles. Standards are clarified progressively through application – reducing the common failure mode where food-system interventions lose coherence between institutions, and giving the framework a stronger basis for broader adoption.
Where relevant, the standards layer aligns with established international standards such as ISO 22000 and ISO 14001, with ISO 31000 informing the risk dimension. Alignment matures through application, not as a fixed stack imposed at the outset.
The articles below provide contextual perspective on systemic standards and regenerative land-use practice. They illuminate conditions that matter directly to circular food systems.
128 City Road
London EC1V 2NX
United Kingdom
Copyright © Terravive Group 2026. All Rights Reserved.
Companies House reg. no 16233378
