Circular Wind Foundations (CWF) develops recoverable onshore wind-turbine foundations designed for full removal, material separation, and verified recovery at end of life.
The initiative addresses a structural weakness in conventional foundation logic: permanence is treated as normal, while decommissioning, material recovery, and site restoration are pushed to the edge of the asset lifecycle. CWF reverses that logic by treating structural reversibility as a baseline design condition from the outset.
Conventional wind foundations are rarely designed around full recovery. In practice, that can leave developers, landowners, and regulators exposed to uneven end-of-life outcomes, difficult removal conditions, avoidable material loss, and decommissioning liabilities that become harder to manage once the asset reaches the end of its operating life.
Circular Wind Foundations is built for a different outcome. It approaches foundation design with end-of-life accountability built in from the beginning, so that removal feasibility, material separation, recovery pathways, and lifecycle risk are treated as design parameters rather than deferred obligations.
Execution materials, modelling outputs, and certification pathway documentation are available upon request.
Structured domain modelling completed
Lifecycle interdependencies mapped
Material flow and removal constraints identified
Outputs informing architectural and certification planning
Governed domain modelling completed
Preparation underway for engineering collaboration
The initiative is anchored in the UGA standards architecture. Relevant UGA standard families already constrain design viability, including UGA-0000706 (Wind Energy Sub-Standard) under UGA-0000125 (System Resilience), together with selected protocols under UGA-0000313 (Clean-Loop Materials) governing material traceability, loop integrity, and lifecycle accountability. These standards matter here because CWF is not simply a foundation design. It is a recoverable infrastructure logic that must remain coherent across design, construction, operation, decommissioning, and recovery.
In practice, this means the standards shape decisions upstream, not only at review stage. They influence how removability is treated in the design basis, how materials are specified and documented, how recovery claims can be evidenced, and how end-of-life execution is kept feasible rather than deferred into a later liability problem.
Where relevant, the UGA standards are designed to align with established international standards and frameworks for wind turbine support-structure integrity, asset management, risk management, and environmental management, including DNV-ST-0126, ISO 55001, ISO 31000, and ISO 14001.
Certification pathway discussions have been conducted with DNV. Type Approval schemes apply to wind turbine materials, including DNV-SE-0295 for cementitious structural grouts. Technology Qualification under DNV-SE-0160 applies to innovative materials. Certification and approval are contingent on formal qualification.
End-of-life accountability in wind is uneven across Europe: most jurisdictions impose a legal duty to dismantle and restore sites, but only some require insolvency-proof financial security that guarantees execution if the original project company fails.
France is a clear example of mandatory decommissioning guarantees, while Germany commonly enforces removal obligations through permit conditions and associated security instruments, and Nordic offshore regimes such as Denmark embed decommissioning security directly in licence and tender terms.
Circular Wind Foundations is designed for this regulatory reality: recoverable foundation design reduces end-of-life risk at the engineering level, while bankable decommissioning security structures help close the funding gap where regulation alone does not.
CWF is structured as a commercial company with embedded impact value. Its primary route to market is licensing: developers and OEMs secure rights to use a recoverable foundation design that improves lifecycle economics, strengthens compliance positioning, and reduces end-of-life exposure.
A second pathway comes through turnkey foundation delivery with regional manufacturing and construction partners. That can include supply, installation, and, where relevant, recovery planning from the contracting stage. As deployments grow, CWF can extend into lifecycle support services such as recovery verification, decommissioning planning, training, and selected technical support services. This creates a credible path from productized design value to recurring service-layer revenue.
Circular Wind Foundations sits within Circular Energy Infrastructure, the TG platform for circular energy initiatives. Within that wider context, CWF focuses specifically on recoverable onshore wind foundation systems and their certification, deployment, and end-of-life logic.
These publications place Circular Wind Foundations in a broader infrastructure context. They span onshore wind, hydro decommissioning, and systemic standards, and together they show the wider technical and standards logic shaping recoverable energy infrastructure.
128 City Road
London EC1V 2NX
United Kingdom
Copyright © Terravive Group 2025. All Rights Reserved.
Companies House reg. no 16233378
