The Sahel Bridge Initiative strengthens the operating environment for large-scale ecological restoration across the Sahel. It supports alignment between restoration initiatives, national programmes, technical partners, funders, and multilateral institutions by improving coordination conditions, consolidating knowledge, clarifying execution requirements, and strengthening the link between ambition, capital, verification, and field delivery.
Large-scale restoration across the Sahel already benefits from significant knowledge, institutional ambition, and active implementation capacity. The persistent challenge is coherence: definitions vary, funding pathways remain fragmented, execution conditions differ across countries, and institutional confidence often weakens before capital can move at scale. SBI addresses this gap by helping restoration actors work within a clearer, more fundable, and more coordinated execution environment.
SBI strengthens the capital, coordination, and continuity conditions required for large-scale ecological programmes across the West African Drylands. It is designed to prevent fragmentation, funding volatility, and institutional drift by embedding financial continuity, verified delivery, and coordination discipline directly into programme architecture.
SBI helps restoration efforts move beyond isolated project logic by strengthening the shared structures needed for coordination, financing confidence, verified delivery, and long-horizon stewardship.
Despite operating across extended time horizons and multiple institutional layers, large-scale dryland programmes under the GGW framework repeatedly encounter structural bottlenecks: short funding horizons, fragmented execution mandates, discontinuous coordination, and uneven monitoring standards.
These constraints are institutional rather than ecological. They stem from time-bound financing structures, mandate fragmentation, and the absence of a structured continuity mechanism linking capital, oversight, and field execution.
The financing logic is embedded within the governance architecture of the programme, aligning capital deployment, verification standards, and operational mandates at the structural level. Delegation chains, data custody rules, and consolidated reporting pathways ensure that funding commitments, monitoring systems, and field execution remain institutionally connected. The result is sustained accountability beyond individual funding cycles and leadership transitions.
SBI translates this operating logic into staged capital sequencing, verification thresholds, and funding conditions:
Catalytic capital initiates structured programme activation
Milestone verification unlocks blended and concessional layers
Institutional capital assumes long-term positions as risk declines
Multi-year O&M commitments are secured to protect survival across seasons
Disbursements are conditional on defined performance criteria
Capital deployment follows defined verification thresholds and multi-year continuity commitments, progressively reducing execution risk as institutional confidence increases.
Significant institutional capital is already directed toward large-scale impact initiatives. The constraint is rarely willingness to fund, but confidence in execution conditions – governance continuity, structural traceability, and long-horizon accountability. SBI contributes to strengthening these conditions. It improves the programme environments within which institutional funding decisions can be made with greater assurance.
Burkina Faso provides SBI’s first structured validation pathway, with a fully developed pilot architecture for field execution, reporting, verification, and capital sequencing. Senegal is being developed as the next national adaptation pathway, supported by emerging local coordination capacity, government-facing relationships, and the firm intention to define a Senegal-specific pilot aligned with national priorities and Great Green Wall objectives.
Execution materials, modelling outputs, and certification pathway documentation are available upon request.
Within the Unified Governance Continuum (UGC), the Sahel Bridge Initiative illustrates how territorial-scale ecological programmes can remain governable over multiple decades by sustaining governance memory, financing continuity, and stewardship obligations.
The initiative is grounded in UGA standard families whose constraints materially shape design viability, including UGA-0000107 (System Governance), UGA-0000125 (System Resilience), UGA-0000215 (Multilateral Governance), and UGA-0000413 (Ecological Continuity).
Together, these standards constrain programme design choices upfront, ensuring that implementation, financing, and stewardship obligations remain coherently linked across decades.
In practice, the combined standard set defines non-negotiable requirements for governance continuity, financing discipline, ecological stewardship, institutional memory, and accountability chains. This helps prevent the common failure mode where stewardship, financing, and coordination decisions are deferred, improvised, or made infeasible by earlier governance and design choices.
The UGA standards are currently at Concept stage and are advanced toward multilateral adoption through demonstrated real-world compliance, which this initiative is designed to help provide alongside other initiatives.
SBI is currently being operationalized through a field pilot in Burkina Faso. The pilot applies SBI’s continuity architecture within an active programme environment, integrating staged capital sequencing, verified delivery routines, and monitoring structures from the outset. This deployment establishes an operational validation pathway for long-horizon coordination logic under real institutional conditions.
Burkina Faso provides the first structured validation pathway. Senegal is being developed as the next national adaptation pathway, with emphasis on Senegalese priorities, Great Green Wall alignment, local technical capacity, and a suitable pilot profile.
In Burkina Faso, field execution is carried out by Terre Verte, operating within the governance, MRV, and capital sequencing architecture defined by SBI.
Rural degradation across the Sahel has intensified over recent decades, driven by erosion, uncontrolled runoff, extensive grazing, and declining soil fertility. On the Central Plateau of Burkina Faso, these dynamics have reduced agricultural resilience and increased vulnerability to climatic variability.
In response, Terre Verte developed and implemented a hedgerow perimeter model (bocage, known locally as wégoubri) designed to retain water where it falls, stabilize soils, and structure land use within defined commons and individual plots. The model combines earthen dikes, single and mixed hedgerows, controlled access points, and pasture with electric fence grazing, with the entire perimeter managed as a form of joint ownership by the participating farmers.
This approach reconfigures agricultural space to reduce runoff, limit livestock intrusion, and enable soil restoration practices such as zaï cultivation and composting. The result is a structured agro-sylvo-pastoral environment capable of supporting sustained productivity under semi-arid conditions.
Within the Sahel Bridge Initiative, Burkina Faso serves as the initial validation node, where this perimeter model is being assessed under defined survival, reporting, coordination, and capital sequencing parameters.
Photo credit: Terre Verte, Burkina Faso – www.eauterreverdure.org
Terre Verte has operated in Burkina Faso since 1989, developing and implementing bocage systems (wégoubri) through inter-village associations, each owning a pilot farm serving as an operational anchor for bocage development. The model integrates soil and water conservation, livestock management, and agroecological intensification within jointly managed spaces structured around the Sahelian bocage perimeter framework.
The concept was developed at the Guiè Pilot Farm in the 1990s and has since been replicated across multiple sites. It combines earthen dykes, hedgerows, shared infrastructure, and structured land consolidation mechanisms to mitigate erosion, retain water, and stabilise agricultural productivity, while also addressing structural challenges related to rural land tenure.
Terre Verte also manages the Centre de Formation des Aménageurs Ruraux (CFAR), also known as the École du Bocage, formally established in 2008. The centre provides multi-year technical training in the restoration of degraded land, rural road and bulli construction, agroecology, ecological livestock management, forest nurseries and reforestation, and rural crafts.
In the Burkina Faso Pilot, Terre Verte serves as the designated field implementation partner, operating within the structured validation, monitoring, and capital sequencing framework established by SBI.
Photo credits: Terre Verte, Burkina Faso – www.eauterreverdure.org
Senegal is being developed as SBI’s next national adaptation pathway, building from the validation architecture established for Burkina Faso.
Current progress in Senegal has moved beyond general exploration. TG has multiple government-facing entry points, emerging local coordination capacity, an identified technical lead already active in Senegal’s public-sector software environment, and relationship pathways into funding and partnership functions. This creates a credible basis for structured engagement around a Senegal-specific restoration pathway.
The Senegal pathway will be developed through structured adaptation, not blueprint deployment. The objective is to combine Terre Verte’s extensive knowledge and field experience with the Sahelian bocage method with restoration practices, technical capacity, land-use conditions, and local methods already present in Senegal. This allows SBI to use Burkina Faso as a validation anchor while developing a Senegal-specific pilot suited to national priorities and Great Green Wall objectives.
The pathway also creates a natural point of synergy with the Circular System Governance Initiative (CSGI). Where SBI structures restoration, capital readiness, and field-execution continuity, CSGI supports the institutional side of the pathway: decision formation, mandate clarity, counterpart coordination, recordkeeping, follow-up discipline, and continuity between public authorities, technical actors, funders, and implementation partners.
The articles below examine systemic conditions and signals shaping dryland environments and regenerative opportunity spaces. Together they provide contextual perspective on ecological dynamics, socio-economic pressures, and emerging pathways relevant to long-horizon restoration and resilience efforts.
128 City Road
London EC1V 2NX
United Kingdom
Copyright © Terravive Group 2025. All Rights Reserved.
Companies House reg. no 16233378
